The concepts of neurodiversity and gender identity represent two critical aspects of understanding how individuals experience the world, but their intersection is often overlooked in traditional research and discourse on mental health. Neurodiversity refers to the diversity of human brains and minds, recognizing neurological differences—such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dyslexia, and others—as natural variations rather than disorders. Gender, on the other hand, refers to the social and cultural roles, behaviors, and identities that societies associate with individuals based on their perceived sex.
Both neurodiversity and gender are critical factors in shaping mental health experiences. Neurodivergent individuals often face specific mental health challenges due to societal misunderstandings and stigmas about their neurological conditions. Meanwhile, individuals who do not conform to traditional gender norms, such as women or gender minorities (non-binary, genderqueer, etc.), experience unique mental health struggles influenced by societal expectations and gender roles. When these factors intersect, particularly in underrepresented groups, the resulting mental health challenges can become compounded, requiring a nuanced understanding and approach.
This paper explores the ways in which neurodivergent individuals, especially those with ASD and ADHD, experience mental health challenges differently across gender, with a special focus on how these challenges manifest uniquely in underrepresented gender groups. We will investigate diagnostic disparities, the role of societal expectations, the psychological impact of gendered experiences, and strategies for inclusive mental health care.
Understanding Neurodiversity
Defining Neurodiversity
The term “neurodiversity” was coined by sociologist Judy Singer in the late 1990s, and it describes the concept that neurological differences are to be respected and valued as part of human diversity. Conditions such as autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and other cognitive variations are often classified as “neurodevelopmental disorders” in clinical settings, but neurodiversity challenges the medical model, which seeks to treat or “normalize” these conditions.
Instead, the neurodiversity paradigm advocates for acceptance and inclusion of people whose neurological makeups differ from the so-called “typical” or neurotypical brain. Neurodivergence includes individuals on the autism spectrum, those with ADHD, learning disabilities, and even conditions like obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), Tourette’s syndrome, and others.
Neurodivergence and Mental Health
Mental health challenges are disproportionately high among neurodivergent individuals. Many neurodivergent conditions come with additional mental health difficulties such as anxiety, depression, sensory overload, emotional dysregulation, and social struggles. These mental health challenges can stem not only from the intrinsic nature of neurodivergent conditions but also from the stigma, marginalization, and misunderstanding that individuals face in a world that is predominantly designed for neurotypical individuals.
For example, someone with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may struggle with social communication and repetitive behaviors, and these struggles can lead to social isolation, anxiety, and depression. Similarly, someone with ADHD may struggle with concentration and hyperactivity, leading to issues with academic performance, work-related stress, and difficulties in relationships, which can result in low self-esteem and frustration.
The mental health landscape for neurodivergent individuals is complex, and these challenges often interact with gender in profound ways, which we will explore in subsequent sections.
Gender and Neurodiversity
Gender and Diagnosis
One of the most striking issues in the relationship between neurodiversity and gender is how gender influences the diagnosis of neurodivergent conditions. Traditionally, many conditions like autism and ADHD have been diagnosed predominantly in males. In fact, both ADHD and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are more frequently diagnosed in males than females, with some estimates suggesting a ratio as high as 4:1 for ADHD (boys to girls) and 3:1 for ASD.
However, gender bias in the diagnostic process contributes to a misunderstanding of how neurodivergent conditions present in females, leading to underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis. Girls and women with conditions like ADHD or autism may not display the overt behaviors seen in their male counterparts (such as hyperactivity in ADHD or noticeable social deficits in autism). Instead, they may exhibit more internalizing symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, or daydreaming, which are more likely to be dismissed or attributed to other factors like mood disorders or emotional instability.
For example, girls with ADHD often exhibit less externalized hyperactivity, instead displaying symptoms of inattention, emotional dysregulation, or daydreaming. Because these symptoms are less disruptive or noticeable, they are often overlooked or misinterpreted as “moodiness” or “shyness” rather than as symptoms of a neurodivergent condition.
Similarly, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in females is frequently underdiagnosed, particularly in high-functioning individuals who may mask or camouflage their autistic traits. Research has shown that females with autism may develop better social strategies, mimic social behaviors, and be better at blending in compared to their male counterparts, making it more difficult for them to be diagnosed in childhood. As a result, many women with autism are not diagnosed until adulthood, when the pressures of social interaction, work, and family life trigger mental health challenges like anxiety and depression.
This gender bias in diagnosis contributes to a lack of appropriate treatment and support for neurodivergent females and individuals in other gender categories.
Gender and Social Masking
Social masking is a coping mechanism where neurodivergent individuals conceal or suppress their natural behaviors to conform to social expectations. It is particularly common among neurodivergent women and gender minorities. The pressure to mask or hide neurodivergent traits can be especially intense for women, who are often expected to display characteristics such as emotional sensitivity, empathy, and social ease.
For instance, many women with autism may mask their difficulties by mimicking social behaviors, suppressing stimming (repetitive behaviors), or hiding sensory sensitivities. This can be emotionally and cognitively exhausting, leading to mental health challenges such as anxiety, depression, and burnout. Masking can also delay diagnosis, meaning that women may go undiagnosed for years, without receiving the appropriate supports or accommodations.
The experience of gendered expectations (e.g., women should be nurturing, empathetic, and socially adaptable) places additional strain on neurodivergent individuals, leading to a heightened vulnerability to mental health struggles.
Intersectionality: Neurodivergence and Gender Minority Identities
For gender minorities (such as non-binary, genderfluid, or genderqueer individuals), the intersection of neurodivergence and gender identity can create a unique set of mental health challenges. Gender minorities often face discrimination, stigmatization, and marginalization due to their gender identity. When these individuals also have neurodivergent conditions, such as ADHD or autism, these challenges are compounded, leading to heightened risks for mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and suicidality.
Moreover, gender minorities may struggle to find mental health professionals who are both trained in neurodiversity and gender-affirming care. Many therapists may not fully understand the complex needs of individuals who live at the intersection of neurodivergence and non-binary gender identities.
The lack of intersectional care—mental health care that is sensitive to both neurodivergent traits and gender diversity—results in inadequate support for gender non-conforming neurodivergent individuals.
Mental Health Challenges Faced by Neurodivergent Individuals Across Gender
Social Stigma and Internalized Shame
Stigma surrounding both neurodivergence and gender nonconformity often leads to internalized shame. Individuals who experience both neurodivergence and gender nonconformity may be exposed to double stigma: one related to their neurodivergent condition and the other based on their gender identity. For example, a woman with ADHD may face criticism for being “disorganized” or “emotional,” while a non-binary individual with autism may be subjected to discrimination not only for their neurodivergent traits but also for their gender identity.
This double stigma can lead to a diminished sense of self-worth and low self-esteem, contributing to a cycle of mental health challenges such as depression and anxiety.
Impact of Gender Norms on Mental Health
Societal gender norms—which prescribe certain roles, behaviors, and emotional expressions for individuals based on their gender—can create additional mental health difficulties for neurodivergent individuals. For instance, women with ADHD or autism may experience frustration due to the expectation that they should be able to “multitask,” “stay organized,” and be emotionally attuned to others, even when these abilities may be challenging due to their neurodivergence.
Similarly, gender minorities may struggle with the pressure to conform to societal norms about gender presentation and behavior. These pressures can exacerbate existing mental health challenges, especially for neurodivergent individuals who may already face difficulties in regulating their emotions or social interactions.
Addressing the Mental Health Needs of Neurodivergent Individuals Across Gender
Inclusive and Gender-Affirming Mental Health Care
To address the mental health needs of neurodivergent individuals across gender, it is essential to adopt a more inclusive and gender-affirming approach to care. Mental health professionals must be trained to recognize the intersectionality of neurodivergence and gender identity and ensure that their practices respect and accommodate both.
This includes offering gender-affirming care that recognizes and supports a range of gender identities, as well as offering accommodations and strategies for neurodivergent individuals that can improve their emotional regulation and social interactions.
Advocacy and Support Networks
Creating advocacy groups and support networks specifically for neurodivergent women and gender minorities is crucial. These groups can help reduce social isolation, promote mental health awareness, and provide individuals with a sense of community and belonging. Peer support is often a powerful tool for promoting well-being among individuals facing similar challenges.
Why it Needs Discussion?
The intersection of neurodiversity, gender, and mental health is an increasingly critical area of discussion due to the complex and often overlooked challenges faced by neurodivergent individuals, particularly those from underrepresented gender groups. The need for this discussion arises from several important factors that highlight the profound impact these intersections have on people’s lives, and the gaps in research, healthcare, and societal understanding that exacerbate these challenges. Below are the main reasons why this topic requires urgent attention and discussion:
Growing Recognition of Neurodiversity
Neurodiversity, as a concept, has gained more recognition in recent years, emphasizing that neurological differences such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and dyslexia are not disorders to be cured, but rather part of the natural variation of the human brain. This recognition has led to greater awareness and advocacy around the needs of neurodivergent individuals, but many challenges remain. Understanding the intersection of neurodiversity and gender is essential for fostering a more inclusive and supportive environment for those with neurological differences.
Underrepresentation and Misdiagnosis of Women and Gender Minorities
Historically, neurodivergent conditions have been underdiagnosed in females, and even more so in gender minorities (e.g., non-binary, genderqueer individuals). Gender biases in diagnostic criteria and societal expectations about behavior often result in misdiagnosis or delayed diagnoses for women, girls, and gender minorities. For example, girls with ADHD might be overlooked because their symptoms—such as inattentiveness and emotional dysregulation—are less disruptive than the hyperactivity often seen in boys. Similarly, women and gender minorities with autism spectrum disorder may mask or camouflage their symptoms, making it harder for them to receive a timely diagnosis. Without a proper understanding of how gender norms influence neurodivergent experiences, many individuals may go undiagnosed or untreated, leading to worsened mental health.
Unique Mental Health Challenges
Neurodivergent individuals already face a higher risk of mental health challenges such as anxiety, depression, social isolation, and stress due to the challenges posed by their neurological differences. When gender and neurodivergence intersect, these challenges become more complex. For instance, gendered expectations (e.g., women are expected to be nurturing, organized, and socially adept) can place added pressure on neurodivergent individuals who struggle to meet those expectations. Similarly, gender minorities may experience unique mental health challenges related to societal rejection, discrimination, and a lack of understanding, which can be compounded by their neurodivergence.
Moreover, the phenomenon of masking—where neurodivergent individuals hide their symptoms to conform to societal expectations—can have a detrimental effect on mental health, especially for women and gender minorities. This can lead to feelings of exhaustion, burnout, anxiety, and even depression, as individuals struggle to maintain a facade that doesn’t reflect their true selves.
Mental Health Services Are Not Gender-Inclusive
The mental health field, in general, has often failed to adequately account for the intersectionality of neurodiversity and gender identity. This gap in care creates a scenario where individuals who experience both neurodivergence and gender nonconformity are not receiving the most appropriate or comprehensive support. Mental health professionals may be well-versed in either neurodiversity or gender identity, but not both. As a result, gender minorities and neurodivergent individuals may face barriers to receiving care that is tailored to their unique needs.
Gender-specific approaches to mental health often focus on cisgender individuals (those whose gender identity aligns with the sex they were assigned at birth) and may fail to address the diverse needs of gender nonconforming individuals. This gap can leave many gender minorities without proper care, further exacerbating mental health challenges.
Additionally, gendered mental health frameworks may not recognize the social and emotional struggles of neurodivergent women or gender minorities who experience unique forms of discrimination, invalidation, and exclusion based on both their gender and neurological differences.
Increased Risk of Social Stigma and Discrimination
Neurodivergent individuals are often subject to stigma related to their conditions. This stigma can lead to social exclusion, bullying, and marginalization, which significantly contribute to mental health problems like anxiety and depression. However, the stigma faced by neurodivergent individuals is compounded when gender identity comes into play.
For example, gender minorities may face significant levels of discrimination, including rejection from family, peers, or society. This can lead to increased vulnerability to mental health problems such as self-harm, suicidal thoughts, or substance abuse. When combined with the challenges of neurodivergence, these individuals are at an even greater risk of negative mental health outcomes. Double stigma—being stigmatized for both neurodivergence and gender identity—further isolates individuals, creating a cycle of worsening mental health.
The Need for Intersectional Approaches to Care
The complexity of the intersection between neurodivergence and gender identity requires an intersectional approach to care. Intersectionality refers to the interconnected nature of social categories like gender, race, sexual orientation, and disability, which can create overlapping systems of discrimination or disadvantage. In the case of neurodivergent individuals, especially those who are gender minorities, the compounded effects of societal marginalization can have a profound impact on mental health.
An intersectional approach to mental health care recognizes the unique experiences of individuals who occupy multiple marginalized identities and aims to provide more personalized and holistic support. Mental health professionals must consider how gender expectations intersect with neurodivergent traits to better understand the full spectrum of challenges a person faces. Without this awareness, important aspects of mental health—such as social functioning, emotional regulation, and sense of belonging—may not be adequately addressed.
Fostering Inclusive Societies
A broader societal shift towards greater inclusion of both neurodivergent individuals and gender minorities is necessary. As awareness and advocacy for both neurodiversity and gender inclusivity continue to grow, it’s crucial to create supportive environments in schools, workplaces, communities, and healthcare systems. Such environments can reduce stigma, increase understanding, and promote better mental health outcomes.
Creating inclusive spaces also means reexamining traditional gender roles and recognizing the diverse ways in which individuals express their gender identity and neurological differences. This requires education, public awareness campaigns, and policy changes that prioritize accessibility, equity, and support for all people, regardless of their gender or neurological profile.
Conclusion
The intersection of neurodiversity, gender, and mental health creates a complex and multifaceted landscape, especially for individuals who are both neurodivergent and gender nonconforming. The unique mental health challenges experienced by neurodivergent women and gender minorities demand a deeper understanding of how both neurodivergence and gender identity interact to shape their experiences.
To truly support these individuals, it is crucial to adopt a more inclusive, gender-affirming, and neurodiversity-affirming approach to mental health care, offering the necessary tools and resources to navigate the complexities of identity and neurological differences. Through better diagnosis, recognition of the importance of social masking, and a deeper understanding of intersectionality, society can begin to provide better support for those at the intersection of neurodivergence and gender diversity, promoting better mental health outcomes for all.
SOURCES
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175.
Bejerot, S., & Cederlund, M. (2014). Autism spectrum disorder in women and men: A sibling study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(10), 2837-2843.
Chown, N., & Beardon, L. (2017). Gender differences in autism spectrum disorders: A literature review. The British Journal of Special Education, 44(1), 22–39.
Denny, L. (2022). Neurodivergence and gender identity: Exploring the intersection of ADHD and gender minorities. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(3), 339–354.
Durkin, K., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2007). Gender differences in language impairment and social competence: A longitudinal study of children with specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(10), 1055–1064.
Ellis, L. K., & Wozniak, J. R. (2017). ADHD in women and girls: Gender differences and implications for treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 73(12), 1545–1557.
Goswami, U. (2004). Neuroscience and education: From research to practice. Psychology Press.
Haas, A. P., Eliason, M., Mays, V. M., Mathy, R. M., Cochran, S. D., D’Augelli, A. R., & Jarrett, T. (2011). Suicide and suicide risk in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: Review and recommendations. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(1), 10–51.
Kirkovski, M., & Enticott, P. G. (2016). Gender differences in autism spectrum disorders: A review of the literature. Autism Research, 9(1), 27–38.
Kuhne, L. E. (2020). Masking in autism: Implications for mental health. Neurodiversity and Mental Health Journal, 9(2), 44–56.
Kumar, P., & Choudhury, S. (2019). Gender differences in neurodiversity: Re-examining the role of autism spectrum disorder in girls. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(4), 1387–1399.
Miller, D., & Lichtenstein, P. (2015). Gender differences in the presentation of ADHD in adults. Journal of Attention Disorders, 19(4), 303–312.
Murray, C. D., & Hannan, S. (2022). Exploring the experience of neurodivergent women and the implications for mental health care. International Journal of Women’s Health, 14, 89–100.
Nieves, D., & Schofield, K. (2020). The intersectionality of neurodiversity and gender: Challenges and opportunities in mental health. Journal of Gender and Social Work, 33(1), 23–38.
O’Hara, J. M., & Lister, A. (2021). Gender, neurodivergence, and mental health: A framework for inclusive psychological care. Psychology and Mental Health, 28(4), 45–60.
Shattuck, P. T., & Grosse, S. D. (2007). The contribution of neurodiverse individuals to the workplace. Autism and Employment, 35(3), 121–134.
Sutherland, H., & Newman, L. (2019). Gender diversity in autism spectrum disorder: Considerations for mental health practitioners. Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 31(1), 26-40.
Willis, J., & Brown, R. (2021). Autism and gender: Understanding the lived experiences of neurodivergent women. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(5), 1760–1773.
HISTORY
Current Version
December, 19, 2024
Written By
BARIRA MEHMOOD